326 – No Buddhist Bible: A Brief Overview of 2500 Years’ Worth of Buddhist Texts (1 of 2)

326 – No Buddhist Bible: A Brief Overview of 2500 Years’ Worth of Buddhist Texts (1 of 2)

You may have discovered there are lots of Buddhist texts and teachings. Jews have their Torah, Christians their Bible, Muslims their Quran, and Hindus their Vedas, but Buddhists have no divinely-inspired central text, or even collection of texts, to serve as a definitive source of orthodox teachings. The texts considered authoritative in at least one sect of Buddhism would fill a decent-sized library. This episode (along with Part 2) is meant to be a brief and broad overview of 2500 years’-worth of Buddhist texts in the Zen lineage. Hopefully, it can give you some context for whatever text you might find yourself reading.

325 – Imagine Yourself as a Buddha and Unblock Your Natural Generosity

325 – Imagine Yourself as a Buddha and Unblock Your Natural Generosity

In Buddhism, we are guided by the ideal of a Buddha, or awakened being. One of the characteristics of a Buddha is unconditional and selfless generosity, and when your generosity is blocked, you can be sure that some part of you still needs understanding, healing or liberation. On the other hand, when you’re able to set aside your self-doubt and imagine yourself as a Buddha, when you look on other beings as if they were your children, you may find your generosity flows more naturally.

323 – Zazen Como Autocuidado Desafiante

323 – Zazen As Defiant Self-Care

Since the term arose in 1950’s, “self-care” has referred to a number of different things. If we consider self-care to be things you do to remain physically and mentally healthy, then Zazen – simple, goalless, Zen meditation – can be seen as excellent self-care. In these troubled times, such self-care can even be seen as defiant – refusing to be broken down by challenging circumstances. Other forms of meditation can also be seen as self-care, of course, but Zazen can be a little difficult to get your mind around. Framing it as self-care may help you appreciate what it’s all about.

321 – How Buddhist is Zen? The Buddha’s Teachings Compared to Radical Nondualism

321 – How Buddhist is Zen? The Buddha’s Teachings Compared to Radical Nondualism

Viewed historically, Zen is a form of Mahayana Buddhism that evolved from the original forms Buddhism that were established in India after the Buddha’s death around 2,500 BC. Many aspects of original Buddhism are retained in Zen, including respect for Shakyamuni Buddha and his teachings. However, the degree of transformation Buddhism underwent when it took root in China and evolved into Chan (later called “Zen” in Japan) is difficult to overestimate, resulting in a path of radical nondualism. Both the ultimate goal of practice and the means to achieve that goal changed so radically that it’s legitimate to question whether Chan is even Buddhism. If you want to walk the path of Zen/Chan, it’s essential to understand how it differs from original Buddhism.

319 – Preguntas y Respuestas: Vida Universal, el Voto del Bodhisattva, el Monacato y otras Tradiciones

319 – Q&A: Universal Life, the Bodhisattva Vow and Monasticism, and Other Traditions

This is one of my unscripted Q&A episodes, where I answer questions submitted by listeners. What does Kosho Uchiyama mean in his book Opening the Hand of Thought, when he talks about “settling as universal life?” Isn’t the Zen emphasis on monastic practice and self-liberation at odds with the Bodhisattva Vow to free all beings? What can we learn from practicing with other Buddhist traditions than our own, and is this recommended if we don’t live near a Zen center?

318 – Amar a Tus Enemigos: Extender  Metta No Significa Capitular

318 – Loving Your Enemies: Extending Metta Does Not Mean Capitulation

Unlike Jesus, the Buddha didn’t explicitly instruct us to “love our enemies.” However, he did instruct us to extend goodwill, or Metta, to all beings unconditionally – including, of course, our enemies. In this time of growing divisiveness, what does it really mean to follow this teaching? Most people will admit that nurturing resentment and hatred is probably a bad idea, but on the other hand it feels completely unacceptable to capitulate to – surrender to or stop resisting – those who we perceive as causing harm. Fortunately, there are many benefits to loving our enemies, and doing so does not mean capitulating to them.

317 – Capítulo 1 del Denkoroku de Keizan: la Sonrisa de Mahakashyapa

317 – Keizan’s Denkoroku Chapter 1: Mahakashyapa’s Smile

In this episode I read and reflect on Chapter One of Keizan’s Denkoroku: Record of the Transmission of Illumination. In it, Shakyamuni Buddha holds up a flower and blinks. Keizan says, “No one knew his intention, and they were silent.” Then Mahakashyapa gives a slight smile, and the Buddha acknowledges him as his Dharma heir. What is going on in this koan? Keizan challenges our ideas about awakening, time, causation, and the nature of self.

316 – Buddhist Communities and Public Political Stands: A Moral Quandary

316 – Buddhist Communities and Public Political Stands: A Moral Quandary

When should Buddhist communities take public stands on issues that could be seen as political? If politics is about how we make decisions in groups (local communities, towns, cities, states, nations), are Sanghas really be free from politics when they are embedded in these larger groups? Silence can function as tacit approval, so is maintaining neutrality in keeping with our Buddhist values? On the other hand, there are many good reasons for Sanghas to avoid bringing discussions of politics in their places of practice, and I discuss them.

Share